• PonyOfWar
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    4% royalty is fine, but they might as well remove the weird install-tracking bullshit at this point.

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      371 year ago

      And stop unilaterally, retroactively modifying contracts.

      • Butterbee (She/Her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        If they thought they could get away with it once, they will try to get away with it again

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t get it, either. Can’t developers just abide by their old contract and not update to newer versions of Unity?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Unity themselves have committed to that option (if you don’t like our new future TOS, keep the old version and don’t update) in writing (that was in their deleted github repo). So it seems extremely likely that they would lose in court.

            The key words in the above are ‘in court’. If you’re an indie unhappy with an x*$.20 charge, chances are a lawsuit will not improve your day.

            • @zipzoopaboop
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              Not usually game engines, updates break builds

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Oh, there won’t be any install-tracking. They will „rely on users to self-report the data“. Sounds to me like they didn’t have any plan for how to reliably track installations in the first place because this is CEO bullshit bingo that was never cleared with the r&d department. So now „I’m sure the users won’t lie to us“ is their best option.