During the trial it was revealed that McDonald’s knew that heating their coffee to this temperature would be dangerous, but they did it anyways because it would save them money. When you serve coffee that is too hot to drink, it will take much longer for a person to drink their coffee, which means that McDonald’s will not have to give out as many free refills of coffee. This policy by the fast food chain is the reason the jury awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages in the McDonald’s hot coffee case. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for their inappropriate business practice.

  • @Whorehoarder
    link
    English
    128
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Must be one of the more successful smear campaigns in recent history. I’m not even from the us and we heard about that shit and used it as an example of greed and frivolous lawsuits. It was only like 5 years back I learned the truth. Believed that shit for 25 years…

    Edit: oops should’ve responded to the media part of thread

    • ANGRY_MAPLE
      link
      fedilink
      English
      501 year ago

      Poor lady. Her labia was physically fused together from the heat, but she was still called dramatic. I can’t imagine everything that she had to go through.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        271 year ago

        And she originally only asked for McDonald’s to cover her medical expenses ($20k) which they refused.