• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1610 months ago

    Better in what ways? I think they are a bit more efficient, but emit more particulates.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2710 months ago

      I believe that they emit less CO2 compared to gasoline powered cars, but a lot more nitrates, which are carcinogenic.

      • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        and acidic and eutrophic nutrients…

        The efficency of diesel engines gets lowered when using proper particulare filters, catalysts and NOx resorption with uric acid. So at best the CO2 benefits are marginal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        “Burns slower”? Are you talking about the engine rpm or cetane value? Neither really has anything to do with cost per unit.

        Generally diesels are more efficient and reliable to their gas counterparts and the better low end torque makes them better for hauling loads. Also better at engine breaking when combined with a manual transmission, so very suitable for mountainous European countries.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          I’m no scientist. A full tank tends to go farther on a diesel model than a gasoline one 🤷

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            There’s more energy per unit in diesel compared to gas and compression ignition burns more efficiently then spark ignition.