• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s weird! I always understood it as minimizing scores you don’t care about to further juice your most desired stats. Eg. Sawing off a shotgun to make it more viable as a quick-draw close-range problem solver. What you’re describing means “Optimizing”, to me

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        To my knowledge you’re correct. In the context of DND you put the least possible points in attributes you don’t care about, while maximizing the stats that do your damage. So you can end up with a sorcerer with more charisma than Jack Nicholson, who is too dumb to tie his own shoes.

    • Khrux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I always think of quintessential min-maxing being to use 5e point buy to choose the stats 8, 15, 8 15, 8, 15 or whatever, literally making your relevant build stats maximum while dumping all else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      It’s not always downsides though. Just a less desirable stat for the build than the one(s) you’re maximizing.

    • @Blueberrydreamer
      link
      21 year ago

      That’s how the modern DnD community has been using it, but that’s absolutely not what it means. It’s just been kinda lost since 5e has basically no options to “Min” anymore. Back in the 90s and early 2000s, most games had options to take flaws that further reduce stats or add other complications in exchange for better base stats or more feats.

      • Xilabar the Dice Goblin
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        This is kinda why I don’t trust Wotc anymore. They are too scared of breaking the game or offending their fans. So they make waffling middle-of-the-road products that are completely bland.