• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    It’ll be a massive victory for artists and a failure for all the sham AI prompt generators.

    There’s not a single downside to requiring all material used in training to be licensed.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      There’s not a single downside to requiring all material used in training to be licensed.

      It destroys the open source/hobbyist sector. The only AIs that would be available for artists to use would be corporate-controlled, paywalled, and filtered. That’s a pretty huge downside.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Ah, so you meant “there’s not a single downside to me.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Nothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new.

            It’s exclusively a benefit to artists

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Nothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don’t care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                AI does not generate anything of value

                I care about artists and the protection of their work. Not the AI models or their creators.

                • FaceDeer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  There are artists who use AI tools as part of their workflow. You don’t care about them.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    And they can allow their art to be used to train AI. It just shouldn’t come at the expense of everyone else who wants to do things the traditional way.

                    Why should my work be open for anyone to use to train AI? I don’t care if it’s a hobbyist or an open model or google. I don’t want them using my work for training their models. Artists currently have rights over their work being used commercially, and I expect AI arguments to go that way as well. If it is to be used then it must be with the permission of the creator and a licensing contract written out. Art can be shared license free or AI permissive licenses, but would not be required to be.