I’ve generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If he had deliberately caused the monkey to take that photo, he might have owned the copyright.

      If you pay a photographer to take photos at your wedding, you own the copyright for those photos - not the photographer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Generally, photographers do not like to offer their services to clients through a Work for Hire Agreement

          If I was getting married, I’d find one that will do a work for hire agreement. It’s my wedding, I want to own the photos. Nobody else should be profiting off them (aside from what I paid them to take the photos).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        If you deal with the photographer that you own the images from the wedding and that’s in the contract, yeah. Otherwise, traditional copyright law would apply, and the photographer gets the rights.