During the trial it was revealed that McDonald’s knew that heating their coffee to this temperature would be dangerous, but they did it anyways because it would save them money. When you serve coffee that is too hot to drink, it will take much longer for a person to drink their coffee, which means that McDonald’s will not have to give out as many free refills of coffee. This policy by the fast food chain is the reason the jury awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages in the McDonald’s hot coffee case. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for their inappropriate business practice.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    You don’t seem to know there is more than one kind of painkiller (US, land of the opioids, amirite?). India had banned oral opium, not for medical use; they didn’t join the Metamozole banning stupidity until 2013, just in time for other countries to start legalizing it as a way to combat opioid addictions (coincidentally, the opioid epidemic in the US started about when Metamozole got banned… surely no relation).

    Saint Mother Teresa, kept giving her patients acetaminophen, several orders less effective than any of the alternatives she had available.

    You’re quoting “Hell’s Angel” which has been pretty thoroughly debunked as bullshit

    Haven’t read that, and don’t plan on doing so. If what I’m saying, based on public sources, happens to match what’s written in there, then you might want to revisit your definition of “pretty thoroughly debunked as bullshit”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        you’re literally just regurgitating the hit piece done by Hitchens

        Not sure which sources are you regurgitating, since Morphine was legal for medical use, and you completely glossed over Metamizole.

        Sounds like the “War on Drugs” talking points, that have so effectively spread illegal (and highly profitable) opioid abuse in the US.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            It was India in the 1950’s dude

            Precisely, dude:

            • Metamizole, invented in the 1920s, legal in India until 2013
            • Mother Teresa started her cult in 1950
            • India didn’t restrict opium use until 1984
              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You may want to brush up on Indian history, including the 19th century India-China wars on (export) of opium.

                India had no legislation regarding narcotics until 1985

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcotic_Drugs_and_Psychotropic_Substances_Act,_1985

                If you check the “non criticism” parts of Mother Teresa’s Wikipedia article linked earlier, you may notice how “this Nun from another country” was receiving Indian awards since 1962.

                So no, there is no justifying of what she did for decades… unless you want to think the Indian government was fine with removing the terminally ill off the streets and dumping them into a hellhole run by a bunch of religious fanatics.

                no one’s ever heard of Pallative Care, because Theresa’s in the middle of inventing the concept!

                Except palliative care is not praying the pain away, this is:

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palliative_care