• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s the chances he gets this overturned on appeal? He mean he had bad council. He could use that and get a new trial?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      IANAL, but Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is well known to be extremely difficult to pull off, and even more so in civil cases. And, as I understand it, Trump’s sole basis for asserting it would be that the paperwork to receive a jury trial wasn’t filed properly, which resulted in a bench trial. Given that the judge otherwise provided acceptable due process to Mr. Trump, and the case appears to have been decided on clearly established facts and relevant law, I find it hard to believe that an appeal would work here.

      Flipping to a different angle: Lawyers constantly fuck up paperwork; if the system allowed paperwork goofs to trigger new trials, it would bog courts down and provide an attack vector for attorneys to take advantage of.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Alex Jones’ lawyer sent his entire phone’s data to the opposing counsel, and he didn’t get a new trial. Now if that’s not a bad lawyer, I don’t know what is.

        I doubt trump will get a new trial. I’m not even sure there’s a decent lawyer left in the country that would work that idiot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Alex Jones’ lawyer

          Was that the same one he had when he said the reason he didn’t know his own children’s ages in a custody hearing was that he ate some chili the night before and it was spicy?

          Because no matter how crazy legal cases have gotten, I don’t think I’ll ever forget that gem

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Alex Jones still hasnt paid a dime of the 1.5 billion he owes either… he never will and I doubt trump ever will pay any of these settlements either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        I was thinking them being morons and being fined because they kept using same defense even after judge said to stop.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Oh, I feel pretty confident that any lawyer would say there is less than zero chance of that forming the basis of an IAC claim.

            • @thepianistfroggollum
              link
              English
              6
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nah, low income housing would piss him off more.

              Or, better yet, turn it into a multi-cultural heritage center.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Hell it would I bet he hate knowing homeless people took over his places. But apparently he has many so we can do both and see which he hates more.

                Quick send him a poll lets see what he thinks?

                • @thepianistfroggollum
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  As gross as it makes me feel to say it, filling it with as many non-white people as possible would probably give him an aneurism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Also NAL, but iirc part of that claim is that the trial would have gone differently otherwise. And I think we all know there was never any chance of that, except maybe not getting sanctioned.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      That would be more able to work if he was a poor person. Instead he’s (allegedly) insanely rich, and actively chose poor council