A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -111 year ago

    did I? or did I just make the logical conclusion feom thwir words, he just said lthat you can’t assume someone is mentally healthy when he approaches you and puts a phone in your face, he said many people don’t understand the trauma of dealing with mentally ill people and feeling threatened thus justifying the actions of the person who shot the youtuber.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -61 year ago

        I really did not, what else is there to interpret from his words?

        as long as you feel threatened and you have past trauma with mentally ill people, you can shoot them in a public place and call it self-defense, it’s just how the US works.

        • Melllvar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Obviously, that being on the receiving end of a someone’s mental health crisis is often frightening and upsetting.

          Your interpretation, that they meant that “it’s OK to shoot the mentally ill”, is absolutely ridiculous.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            How is that a ridiculous when OP was defending a guy who shot someone by saying “every person in this thread that cannot fathom how he feared for his life has never had personal experience dealing with someone with severe mental illness” and “If you think you can just assume a stranger you encounter who shoves a phone in your face is mentally healthy, you’re missing some facts of life”.

            What in the world else do you think that could have meant other than that it’s okay to fear for your life and defend yourself with deadly force because someone is acting mentally ill?