• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    549 months ago

    Then you’d need to include a headphone jack since the headphones acted as the antenna.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        249 months ago

        It’s funny how the few who’re totally sold on Bluetooth go “ugh, but then you’d need a headphone jack” as if it isn’t an upgrade for others which wouldn’t affect their ability to use Bluetooth at all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179 months ago

      You say that like it’s a bad thing. You can still use Bluetooth even when your phone has a headphone jack, and headphone jacks can be IP67 rated so it’s not a concern for waterproofing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          I mean, the only other rating above that is IP68, and that would require them to specify the depth and time that the phone can be submerged. Most manufacturers only go for IP67 because it’s much cheaper to test.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            That I know but I was wondering why you specifically mentioned 67. I guess I misread that as a limit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Nah, not a limit. It’s just a cost/benefit trade off. Manufacturers don’t typically push for IP68 unless they’re specifically marketing the device for underwater use, and believe users will be willing to accept the higher resulting cost.