You can’t get rid of it, you can only hide it: Microsoft imposes controversial Windows Backup on users::Like it or not, the Windows Backup app installed in Windows 10 and Windows 11 is here to stay, with Microsoft calling it a “system component” that can’t be

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      what do you mean by this

      do u think a cloud pc (with constant server costs) shouldnt be a monthly fee?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I think this is likely the “new only Windows option” in the not so distant future. I think it shouldn’t exist.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Their primary use is enterprise not private consumers. Think of virtualized OS accessible over internet that you can manage/protect and provide for example to some random consultant. Or just provide more powerful PC on low end HW.

              It’s costly though and not sure it ever gained traction because there always were alternatives like Citrix Desktops.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Maybe there’s a use case, but I’m anti-cloud and always will be. I struggle to think of a situation I couldn’t do better with in-house (or even air gapped) VMs of my own.

                Anyone who watches 365 uptime knows that Microsoft’s cloud is a fragile laughing stock. They use a Twitter account because their own status portal is so laughably trash and unreliable. If you don’t believe me I don’t blame you. Here it is.

                The day I trust any cloud platform (Especially Microsoft) is the day I promise to jump off a cliff.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Thank you. Exactly. The term “cloud” is just code for “someone else’s computer” and as you say, there’s very little that cannot be done without it. And once you entrust your data to someone else’s hardware, all you really have are assurances and probabilities that what you expect will happen with it becomes what actually happens with it. No guarantees.

                  And you pay for all this, monthly, until the end of time.

                  I don’t blame anyone that wants to go that route, I use a freebie bit of cloud for phone photos myself, but anything of more import, nah. More “cloud” for everyone else, I suppose, because they can have my share.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Can’t imagine it being the case, thin clients have existed for a very long time and Cloud PC is nothing revolutionary just an additional offering from Microsoft.

              Not to mention private consumers will not pay subscription for OS that in long run is a lot more expensive and worse HW that they probably already have.