@FUCKERM to internet [email protected]English • 1 year agoUH OH!lemmy.worldmessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up11.27K
arrow-up11.23KimageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKERM to internet [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square172fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish24•1 year agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.