• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Maps is the only service they have that isn’t bested by something else.

    They’re not making pennies on that data.

    To pay vs letting them slurp up your data you’d be paying Alphabet thousands a year. It will never happen, but sure. It’s a nice fantasy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Your math doesn’t make sense. In 2022 Google had $253B in annual ad revenue. Most estimates that I find have Google services users at 1 Billion+ on the low end. The Ad Revenue per User would be less than $25 a month.

      That is an amount that I would pay for all the services I use. I already pay for YouTube premium which is more than half that cost.

      It’s not for everyone. There are many categories of people; those who couldn’t afford a monthly fee, those that would rather get a free service for data collection and ads even if they could afford it, and those of us that would happily pay for services if the data collection and ads went away.

      There is an argument that the services would be less valuable if data weren’t collected to build the quality of results, like maps data and what not. I would argue that enough people would prefer to go the ad supported route to make that argument moot though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        More than half of their claimed user accounts are inactive. So many in fact that they’re starting to auto-delete inactive accounts. The only way they’d agree to such an idea is if it were far, far more expensive.