• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -31 year ago

    It’s not my understanding of Romans that is flawed, it’s your understanding of freedom and choice.

    • TheDankHold
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      My point is that they were also the in group. It’s very much a flawed perspective, referring to the whole empire as conservative makes it clear.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        They were in the in-group as long as they paid taxes and followed the laws of the people in control of their lives. As long as they never disobeyed or rebelled. I urge you to look up consent before you hurt somebody.

        • TheDankHold
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Ok so no government has ever governed through consent in that respect so I’m not sure why that’s an important issue to bring up. No one consents to be ruled by a government, you’re just born into it in most cases and in others the one you initially didn’t consent to got replaced by yet another that wasn’t consented to.

          You really are glossing over the fact that referring to a 2000 year empire as blanket conservative is ignorant and ahistorical. They were multicultural and, with glaring exceptions, tolerated alternative religions far more than most geopolitical entities through history. It’s a vast history with varying governments, both with progressive ideas for the time and regressive backslides.

          Watering it down to boilerplate 21st century political terminology shows a lack of intellectual rigor in understanding this issue so I don’t think this conversation needs to continue. I wish you well.