• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Isn’t it telling that our society has to gamble on hope because there is a perception of no other chance?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        Sure, but the hope is a result of the first two issues.

        They can’t do the math so they think there is a chance. And because they WANT there to be a chance they ignore every time they lose.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that’s what fuels the hope.

          Even small chances are chances. It’s that simple ;)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            When did I say there weren’t any winners? I said people think there’s a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause.

            https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler's Fallacy.html

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Probably more likely to turn 20$ into a fortune playing the lottery than most other ways you could invest it.