Utah sues TikTok, alleging it lures children into addictive and destructive social media habits::Utah has become the latest state to sue TikTok, alleging the social media company is “baiting” children into addictive and unhealthy habits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    It also implies that one (the worst one) deserves more attention. In this case we should probably be paying attention to both.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        No, they said it was “far worse,” which definitely implies a ranking of how bad they perceive the respective issues.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s possible for more than one thing to be bad, we don’t have to pick just one of the two.

          This is what they said; they implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved. But it didn’t. He said, paraphrasing, “there are two issues and I find this one to be far worse”.

          Ranking issues in terms of how bad they are seems a fairly normal thing to do. It also implies that there is more than one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            they implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved.

            I don’t agree with that interpretation.

            They simply stated that ranking things by “badness” also implies a ranking in terms of which one of those bad things is more urgent and should be addressed first - not that one thing was bad and that the other wasn’t, or that only one thing could be addressed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I’m merely reiterating the position of the poster you replied to.

                You can disagree with that position, but you seemed to be replying to a position that nobody was even taking.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    You were clearly arguing against a position that nobody here took.

                    That means you either lack the reading comprehension to understand what was stated, or you’re purposefully creating a strawman to argue against.