• @out
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      The ranking may make it sound like samsung is the worst. But that’s not been the case since android 12. I do not have app reload or app killing issues on this one and find it much better than what I used to experience on miui.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        I published an app on the play store that purely relies on a persistent notification + wakelocks to keep the screen active (since the whole point of the app is to keep the screen awake) - Samsung was definitely the worst when it comes to this for my app, as I would receive endless support emails about people with Samsung devices where it would get killed, even when disabling battery optimization for my app. The other manufacturers listed there came up every now and then, but disabling battery optimization generally did the trick for them.

        With there being nothing that I could do for my app, I tried disabling compatibility in the play store for a ton of Samsung models, but then I got even more emails about people wondering why it wasn’t available anymore so I re-enabled it, but to this day there’s still (AFAIK) zero things I can do to prevent the app from getting killed on those devices.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          What app is that? I only notice app reload issues when I max my ram usage playing heavy games or running apps that require maximum ram.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            It’s called “Caffeinate” (I’m avoiding posting the direct link just so I don’t break any self promotion rules), I made it in the Android 7 days when the quick settings Tile API came out to replicate the similar tile that was available in CyanogenMod. It ended up getting way more downloads than I ever expected honestly - I just wanted to try the new API haha.

            I know that Caffeinate itself doesn’t use up a lot of RAM (the only thing it does when its active is create a persistent notification and creates a wakelock in order to keep the screen active), but perhaps the lower end Samsung device models just have less RAM available, so opening a browser or such kills it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              I tried your caffeinate app. The last time I checked, it was using 32mb while running. Currently, using 11mb. Android says it uses an average of 143kb with a maximum of 7.8mb for the whole day.

              It has been installed for the past 3 days, and I try it once a day from the drop-down tile. It hasn’t been killed or reloaded yet.

              I have 6GB of ram with 6GB of ram plus enabled. I guess its low ram and cpu usage make it never likely to be booted off ram. Those users who complain must be using Samsung devices on older oneui and / or low ram like 3GB or 4GB.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                Well I definitely am glad to hear that! Yeah the situation is just unfortunate, as there’s really nothing I can do for the users who are getting the issue - since as you’ve seen, Caffeinate is already really light on RAM usage (which would normally be one of the only ways to try to remedy the issue as a developer, from what I can tell).

                In the end I just decided to keep it compatible for all mobile devices, though I did consider adding a “compatibility warning” type of banner to the app or a one-time notification for devices that had a small amount of RAM. Eventually the emails stopped coming in about it though so I figured either the problem ended up resolving itself as updates to the platform occurred, or everyone who was going to run into the issue already ran into the issue. I’ve pretty much considered the app to be feature complete now, short of any Android changes that break it (such as when notification channels was introduced, followed by full-on notification runtime permission requirements).

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  29 months ago

                  You said the app is feature complete. But, if you find the time and energy to spend. You can probably try to add a dark theme that utilizes the “follow system” theme setting. And later if desired material you theming support. Otherwise, it does the job and is good as far as it can go.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    29 months ago

                    Dark theming is definitely a fair point, I’ll definitely need to have a look into that.

                    Material You support is probably going to be out of scope though, as I feel that would be making it complex for the sake of being complex.

                    I do want to learn more about the Material You API that being said.

      • @out
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I do not feel too strongly about it, so I will refrain. But, if I find the time and energy to spend, I may open an issue later.