Too narrow, hidden, minimal feedback…

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1411 year ago

    UX design got better and better for many years…but it has definitely been regressing over the past few years, IMO. It’s weaponized minimalism at this point. Because it “looks cool, bro”.

    It’s a variant of enshittification.

      • P03 Locke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        321 year ago

        Yeah, it has a very specific meaning, and people are now using it to mean “things becoming shitty”. Just because “shit” is the base word doesn’t mean that’s what the whole word means.

        • @Iamdanno
          link
          English
          121 year ago

          Enshittification doesn’t mean “thing gets shittier”? Who knew?!

          • P03 Locke
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, it doesn’t.

            From Wikipedia:

            Enshittification, also known as platform decay,[1] is a way to describe the pattern of decreasing quality of online platforms that act as two-sided markets.

            From the guy who coined the term itself:

            Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. I call this enshittification.

            • @Iamdanno
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s just listing the whys and hows of "things get shittier ".

            • Boozilla
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -31 year ago

              Being a pedant is never a good look. You’re missing the larger point. The same corporate impulse that drives platform decay ripples out to things like UX design. And that impulse is: the customer doesn’t matter anymore, we already got your money, only what we want matters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            “Conservatives want to conserve stuff!” levels of logic.

            Words mean more than what they sound like. If you don’t know this, you cannot speak English.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, thank you! I thought I was the only one. I feel like an old man yelling at the clouds every time I see it.

      • pizzaboi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Underuse IMO. We’ve grown complacent in so many regards.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Thank you. I think it was overused even the moment it was used for its intended purpose. It feels really im14andthisisedgy to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m actually really glad we’re hearing it.

          It’s a sign that people are finally starting to have higher standards.

          I think those with low standards would get upset. Nobody likes to admit they’re being taken advantage of.

        • Boozilla
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          And I think this is a dumb take, considering who coined the word and why. It’s a variation of “I hate anything trendy or popular”.

      • No_
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Are they wrong for using a word correctly? Or are you wrong for being a bitch about it? Hmmm.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Yup, and when I used it, I knew someone would bitch about that. It’s funny how people get hung up on their pet peeve more than they do the more serious underlying issues we’re talking about here. It’s the same phenomenon politicians and wealthy elites use to keep us fighting each other over trivial culture war bullshit instead of pulling together to improve our material interests.

      • Skua
        link
        fedilink
        361 year ago

        You know that the [no] option would be [maybe later]

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Like I’m really that fucking stupid… That you’re your ( 😮‍💨 ) dumb little psychological trick is going to work, and I’m just going to wake up one day with an insatiable hankering for your product? Fuck you, company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        Then you go to click [no] and the web page magically loads something else above it, which moves the page contents, forcing you to click the [yes].

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      applying any design language feels wrong. it’s pure manipulation – i remember being forced onto the official twitter app and couldn’t believe there wasn’t a scroll bar. i felt lost; the timeline felt infinite, swallowing

      • I_Miss_Daniel
        link
        fedilink
        301 year ago

        They want you doom scrolling.

        It’s one reason I like kbin. I’ll read to page 5 and that’s my limit for a session. Endless scrolling is annoying.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          On kbin you have the choice to set it to doom scroll if you want.

          Choice is the important thing with something like doom scrolling.

          • I_Miss_Daniel
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Yes.

            I also like upvote and downvote separated. Some apps don’t have that option.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I would are that the design industry has gotten better about understanding a user’s core motivations, and how design can solve business problems, but it’s gotten worse at classic interaction design / HCI.

      The UX industry is FULL of bootcamp people or former graphic designers who never really studied or were passionate about interaction models.

      As with engineering, the demand for UX designers is so high that a lot of mediocre talent can easily get a gig.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Those scenarios you paint definitely exist.

        In my decades of work experience, I’ve also seen it play out a few ways. Sometimes the shop creating the software is too cheap to hire a real UX designer, and they make some poor coder do their best with it (and the coder will usually admit they are not good at it and is frustrated with being coerced into it). Sometimes they hire a good UX person, but that person is constantly overridden / micromanaged by some “marketing genius” MBA type with horrible ideas of user behaviors they want to “push” and other behaviors they want to “disincentivize” in the UX.

        On a few (rare) projects, I’ve seen it done correctly where the UX designer is considered a vital part of the team and their input is valued and they do a good job and focus on what users actually want and need.

        Some businesses still understand that if your customers are happy, everything else tends to go better for your businesses. But in this era of relentless enshittification, more and more businesses are looking at their customers at naughty children and/or suckers to be exploited. I keep hoping for a massive backlash against this trend. But it feels like it has to get even worse before it will get any better. They have conditioned younger customers to just expect shit products, shit service, and shit subscriptions for everything. UX design has gotten caught up in this sea change, unfortunately.