I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it’s pointing at.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        I’m reminded of Leland Yee. California politician who was in favor of gun control all while doing gun running stuff himself. Guess he felt gun control was good for business.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      No, but often gun control is an “if it stops even one” type of thing. Most of it is predicated on mass shootings which are .001% of gun violence in an attempt to ban the gun that kills <500 out of 60,000 people a year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        Owning a ghost gun is a crime, right?

        (Ignoring the fact that “ghost gun” is a meaningless and intentionally emotionally charged term)

        In New York, yes. In the vast majority of the US, no. It’s illegal to file the serial number off an existing firearm, but 100% legal in most states to manufacture your own unserialized firearms for personal use. Just cannot be sold/transferred.

        I’d note the article you linked says nothing about how many of those are actually 3D printed, it is infinitely easier to deface the serial number on an existing firearm than it is to 3D print one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Ignoring the fact that “ghost gun” is a meaningless and intentionally emotionally charged term

          A ghost gun is what Emporio used to escape from Pucci in JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure: Stone Ocean

      • @Gimpydude
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        From the picture in that article, those guns would blow up in the shooter’s hand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can kind of see the logic.

      Like book piracy was never a huge thing because you’d need a hell of a set up to make a book from scratch. Music piracy however…

      I’m sure a decently skilled craftsman could make a decent firearm with a short trip to Home Depot, but the average Joe can’t make that happen too easily. With a 3D printer, you could have a gun with next to zero skill. Like a decently motivated person is going to find a gun anyway, but this maybe addresses the less motivated people/crimes of passion, etc.

      That being said, if these are the same people advocating for a waiting period, they obviously don’t know how long 3D printing a gun takes.

      Edit: for those downvoting, I’m not saying this is a good idea. I think the same result could be had by going after whoever is hosting the design files. Like at least keep them off thingiverse and make them slightly hard to find.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Book piracy was huge I don’t know what you’re talking about. You could get professionally printed books or you could always just photocopy them.