• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    Ahhh, post modern “there is no truth”.

    Just because CNN has flaws doesn’t mean it’s not a better source of information than “louder with crowder”.

    Organizations that have standards and make reasonable attempts to be accurate should be promoted over “Dave’s rage blog”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      As much as I despise CNN and NYtimes, I have to agree that they’re miles better than many of their peers, and while flawed they’re usually factually on point. I just wish they weren’t as easily swayed by owners and institutions who have vested interest in which stories are run, and which aren’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        People have to realize there is not such thing as perfect. And agreeing with you is not “better”. The echo-chamber is a bad thing, not a good thing.

        Sources of information that have an intention of integrity and who strive to follow it are better sources than rampant unbridled partisanship and yellow-journalism. Even FoxNews (the news side not the trash side) is a better source than some liberal blog that makes no attempt to be objective at all.