• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        58
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. Just no. The federal court and new York State Court have both thoroughly debunked his net worth and it ends up with “probably not able to afford to pay debts even with selling his most valuable property”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          "even with selling his most valuable property our nations nuclear secrets to the Saudi’s".

          I fixed that for you

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        even the most critical standards, his net worth is about $2.5 billion and has access to just under half a billion in cash.

        I would hardly call the Forbes estimate as “the most critical standards”. They don’t have an accurate account of his debts, nor do they have an accurate accounting of his liquidity.

        No one just has half a billion dollars in liquidity laying around, liquidity loses value at the rate of inflation. Unless hes okay with losing at least 18.5 million dollars a year in depreciation, that money has long been invested into some kind of property or has been used to pay debts.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        Net work is supposed to be net, ie including debts.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        What about if we consider all the fraud, unpaid bills, dodged taxes, money laundering (his dad used to buy millions in casino chips and then get rid of them to illegally prop up his failing casinos)? How much does he actually have?