@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agoPaniki.postimg.ccmessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.28K
arrow-up11.23KimagePaniki.postimg.cc@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink25•1 year agoThe neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoThere is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2
The neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
But how do I prove it for 6
Prove it for 2, then un-distribute.
There is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2