• froggers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Still wondering how this will play out in the EU.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It might actually be illegal in the EU for them to run scripts to detect ad blockers without asking permission first.

      • froggers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Yeah, that’s why I’m really curious about how this will play out. I just hope that people will be the ones benefiting from this shitshow and not Youtube.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          YouTube is a for-profit service run by a company. If they can’t make it profitable due to low premium adoption or regulation there will be less freedom to post/view stuff on there. There will be no upside for users.

          Everyone should really reevaluate their stance on premium services and the value they get out of them. The time of free is over - even something like lemmy needs funding.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        So then they’ll just embed them into the video, refuse to serve the video until the time is up, etc. Running clientside snooping scripts is only one way for them to enforce this. The idea that EU law will somehow force YouTube to just serving you content without ads is entirely copium.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          A black screen is infinitely less annoying than an ad. I don’t see google winning this battle.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            OK? That’s still not Google “losing” some battle. The point was the legality of their current implementation isn’t going to change whether they give in and just serve you the content like the OP was claiming

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          So? Let them make those changes then. That’s additional complexity and effort. They absolutely scoped that implementation against the one they chose and chose not to do it. Forcing them to spend the effort is still meaningful.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            You really dont want them embedding ads into videos like that. There’d be no blocking them and no way to download them without the ads baked right into the video file.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              That’s a significantly less profitable ad model. If they wanna shoot themselves, let them

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              SponserBlock provides defenses against that with minor modifications.

              It’s been suggested that that would be an absolute last ditch effort because it trashes your ability to display targeted ads or update them without absolutely wrecking your CDNs. You also can’t have the ad link to anything because that would allow the client to trivially detect and skip it.

              Ad Nauseam also provides the nuclear option of downloading the ads, pretending to display them, and even pretending to click them. You might still have to wait out the delay for while the ad should be playing for the first ad, but once you get past that they can’t prevent the player skipping ads without also preventing you skipping 30s of boring content.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              People will figure out a sponsorblock-esque crowdsourced ad detection that auto skips everything that isn’t part of the video.