ijeff to [email protected]English • 11 months agoOne year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billionarstechnica.commessage-square179fedilinkarrow-up11.11Kcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.06Kexternal-linkOne year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billionarstechnica.comijeff to [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square179fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•11 months agoIs this the wikipedia-argument back at him? The whole twitter post history could fit on a single hard drive, so why are people paying for it?
minus-square@[email protected]cakelinkfedilinkEnglish8•11 months agoThat argument is unfair anyway, cause what fits on a hard drive gets bigger every year.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoNo it’s completely fair because the value of information deflates as we gain better ability to store it! /s
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoAnd there’s endless examples of a small well ordered thing being far more expensive than essentially the same thing less ordered in bigger volume - a room full of carbon dioxide, a bag of coal, a diamond…
Is this the wikipedia-argument back at him? The whole twitter post history could fit on a single hard drive, so why are people paying for it?
That argument is unfair anyway, cause what fits on a hard drive gets bigger every year.
No it’s completely fair because the value of information deflates as we gain better ability to store it! /s
And there’s endless examples of a small well ordered thing being far more expensive than essentially the same thing less ordered in bigger volume - a room full of carbon dioxide, a bag of coal, a diamond…