YouTube is increasing Premium prices in multiple countries, right after an ad-blocker crackdown | You either pay rightfully for the video content you consume, or you live with the ads.::Google is increasing the prices of YouTube Premium and YouTube Music Premium subscriptions in some regions, right after blocking ad-blockers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    Yeah, no… it’s already overpriced.

    Paramount + £6.99 Netflix £10.99 (standard) Youtube £12

    Makes no sense… they don’t have anything like the production overheads. Stuff like Star Trek and Stranger Things are expensive. ‘10 greatest cat videos’ is not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Heck, they don’t even pay a good fraction of their bandwidth because they put caching box in your ISP location to reduce loads. This is a huge privilege as ISPs won’t let any random companies run equipments for free in their network, which is one of a huge barrier for any YouTube competitors.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        They might be allowing them to run the boxes for free, but the ISPs are saving money on bandwidth, too.

        Get enough users for the ISP to care and they’ll work with you. Otherwise, you probably don’t have all that many users to begin with, so the overhead that maintaining and distributing these boxes would create wouldn’t be worth it anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Youtube expenses is revenue share with creators and hosting untold hours of video, over 500 hours uploaded per minute, that others just don’t have to deal with.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      It “makes sense” in that, unlike those two, YT has to deal with thousands of hours of video being uploaded to their servers every minute. What they don’t pay in streaming rights, they pay in storage and bandwidth costs, plus a couple of peanuts for “moderation”, which is probably more expensive in the long run

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Depends on how much you use it. I watch Youtube pretty much every day for at least an hour, while using Netflix or other streaming services about once evey few months. I use Spotify every day too, just because I like their app more in some ways.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        If I had to choose, I’d swap my Netflix and Disney+ subscriptions for YouTube. I think I watch YouTube videos about three times as much as Netflix and Disney.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I already pay for Spotify. They knew exactly what they were doing when they lumped that shit in YouTube premium

        • kirk781
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          IIRC, YouTube Music is also offered as a standalone service, Atleast in some countries. However, the difference b/w YouTube Premium and just the Music service comes out to be miniscule, so folks just pay for the former.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, I want Premium without Music. It’s not offered anywhere.

            Same thing with Amazon. I want Prime without Prime Video. It’s not offered either.

            • kirk781
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Oh, I understand now, especially the second one. The only thing from Amazon’s product line worth using to me is the Prime delivery service. I can’t give two hoots about their Prime Music( which I lost respect for after it denied to run for me on any browser on Linux for some reason) or Prime Video.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I can’t see the value in using youtube for music… it’s not like I can watch music videos in my car. That’s worth $0 to me, and I imagine the majority. Spotify is better… or apple music if you’re on the fruit side.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Youtube music doesn’t have music videos, not sure what you are talking about. It’s just a clone of play music after they shut it down.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          If you’ve already got a solution for ad-free music in your car, sure, obviously. Not everybody has that though.