• oce 🐆
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think he’s saying it’s not a big deal for us, but for the planet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I know, but that’s a very detached and unemotional take… Sure “life” will keep existing. But not the life we know. That we love. That we grew up loving so much.

      I understand not everyone feels exactly like me. But I was absurdly fascinated by biology books and wildlife documentaries and would read and watch them religiously as a child.

      Thinking of all of that just dying and ending truly breaks my heart. Almost more than anything.

      Just not as much as the thought of humanity disappearing. But I know most people share that sadness.

      • oce 🐆
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I also don’t think the person is unemotional, it’s more about having the correct idea of what’s actually going to happen if we don’t do anything. I also think ecology needs more rationality, otherwise we get people closing nuclear plants to restart coal plants.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You do know that the most well informed people (like active researchers in the field) are often the most pessimistic right? Like you hear on the media that “oh no we’re gonna pass 2º! I guess I won’t be able to ski as much”. But you go to a climate science conference and it’s “yeah… now that we can add more parameters and feedback loops into our models the chance of total extinction by 2100 is 99.99%. On the bright side, half of us expected it to be 100%. So kudos”.