Republicans have a racist new idea amid the war on Gaza.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    Maybe just the ones who may be members of Hamas?

    But yeah sure let’s codify the Muslim Ban into law (where I see this ending up).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      Well, hamas is recognised as a terrorist organisation, the US is already probably arresting or deporting known members.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        “Are you now or have you ever been in a terrorist organization”

        They’d never think to lie right? Like, that’d be illegal something terrorists are very concerned about, and yet for some reason that question is on immigration, security clearance and gun sale background checks.

        I’m quite sure there’s a heightened background investigation for immigrants, but I like to make fun of the existence of that question.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          Wildly speculating but… Having been a member of a terrorist organization may not itself be illegal. But submitting false sworn statements could be.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            Well submitting false sworn statements definitely is illegal so you may have a point. Especially since it includes the “have you ever” part, instead of just currently.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          “Are you now or have you ever been in a terrorist organization”

          Probably end up with a lot of dumb fucks going “Hell Yeah I am, Brother! Trump 2024!”

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          So… you may think it’s stupid, and lets be honest, anyone who answers "yes’ is pretty freaking stupid.

          but there are plenty of absolutely dumb-as-shit people. Why not leave it in there and let some of them sort themselves out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s what I thought, but I wasn’t sure if the policy was as explicit as something like “expel them all”. Maybe it is though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m guessing it’s the same policy as with any other terror group. Prosecute them, jail them if guilty*

          __

          __

          __

          __

          __

          __ __

          __ __ __ __ __ __ __ *Not always, look up Guantanamo bay. Most surveillance laws post 9/11 are really scary and give a huge amount of power to nsa and fbi to watch over any American without a warrant. Check Edward Snowden on Wikipedia for more information

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            Most surveillance laws post 9/11 are really scary and give a huge amount of power to nsa and fbi to watch over any American without a warrant

            It’s cute how it actually tries to let them spy on adjacent countries, up to 100mi past the border (or, most of the habitable part of Canada).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              As if they weren’t already spying on every nation they feel like it by simply outsourcing that to google

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          I wasn’t sure if the policy was as explicit as something like “expel them all”

          FTA:

          The Safeguarding Americans From Extremism Act would require the Department of Homeland Security to refrain from issuing visas or granting refugee, asylum, or temporary protected status to anyone holding a passport issued by the Palestinian Authority. It would also revoke visas and refugee or asylum status for anyone who was granted it on or after October 1.