• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      561 year ago

      Nick was supposedly fired for failing to meet goals, goals he was apparently never informed that he should be targeting.

      • Pxtl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “fired” implies “termination with cause”. That is, they believe you screwed up and so you were let go without severance, and in a pinch they’re willing to go to court on that.

        “Laid off” implies they did bulk downsizing and unless the company finds a way to weasel out of it, there’s going to be severance and employment insurance payouts and the like.

        In the Southern states this is a distinction without a difference because they just shoot you in the face and toss you into the body pit there regardless of the cause of the termination of your employment, but in the rest of the world this distinction is real.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      Well, Nick used that term and he‘s probably in a position to know if it‘s the right one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      “To be laid off”, or even better “to be let go”, are fucking euphemisms for “fired”, “kicked out”, etc.
      That sort of vocabulary is typically used by HR to sound more benevolent, whereas when it’s happening to you, you’ll use the more aggressive terms.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      According to the guys who left, Management forced unrealistic targets on the Editor in Chief, then used him not meeting those targets as an excuse to fire him. Everybody else quit in response.