Following the unveiling of new MacBook Pro models last week, Apple surprised some with the introduction of a base 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 chip,...

8GB RAM on M3 MacBook Pro ‘Analogous to 16GB’ on PCs, Claims Apple::Following the unveiling of new MacBook Pro models last week, Apple surprised some with the introduction of a base 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 chip,…

    • @[email protected]English
      16•1 year ago

      What, no! 8 GB Apple RAM costs 4 times that of 16 GB regular DDR4 RAM module.

      Edit: 5 times.

    • GnonpiEnglish
      13•1 year ago

      The interviewee seems to be meaning it as memory usage (quote from them): "Comparing our memory to other system’s memory actually isn’t equivalent, because of the fact that we have such an efficient use of memory, and we use memory compression, and we have a unified memory architecture.

      Actually, 8GB on an M3 MacBook Pro is probably analogous to 16GB on other systems. We just happen to be able to use it much more efficiently."

      • @[email protected]English
        22•1 year ago

        I mean, i played with memory compression on linux too, but it’s not a factor x2 and you trade that with more CPU utilization/less battery life. And even though software is not worse in efficiency on this side, webbrowsers, VMs and games still need the RAM.

        • @[email protected]English
          -2•1 year ago

          I’ve seen this a lot on this thread, but this is Apple we’re talking about. They have billions of dollars to throw at making their memory compression far better than what’s on Linux. I still regularly use an 8gb ddr3 apple macbook air from 2017. It’s not as fast at computing as my 32gb windows laptop, but it feels more snappy. I also have a 16gb desktop, also windows, and the macbook feels just a little slower than that. A little. And it’s ddr3 vs ddr4

          • @[email protected]English
            1•1 year ago

            Ok, honestly, snappyness is mostly the duration of animations, hard to judge from that. Billions for better compression is a mixed bag; it must be cheaper than more RAM in manufacturer prices. And, atleast in Linux, you can choose the compression algorithm, while lz4 has almost memory speed.

            Now i’m curious, are there memory load tests for Linux aswell as Mac?

      • @[email protected]English
        7•1 year ago

        If anything the memory being unified between the GPU and CPU makes it even less than 8GB equivalent

        • @[email protected]English
          3•1 year ago

          Wait, unified VRAM? This is even worse. I thought that they meant all CPU cores share same bus.

      • @[email protected]English
        1•1 year ago

        because of the fact that we have such an efficient use of memory,

        Do they use below 24 megs of RAM in console? Or below 500 megs in GUI? Well, 500 megs is upper bound, I should probably compare to something less bloated than KDE.

        and we have a unified memory architecture.

        Really? They still doing UMA?

        • lorezEnglish
          1•1 year ago

          It’s all unified: CPU, GPU, RAM and SSD as far as I remember.