• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2411 months ago

    He would still pass a background check because he wasn’t fucking prosecuted.

    Authorities said he and another man allegedly shot at a woman while she was driving with her two children. At least two bullets hit the vehicle. The charges were ultimately dismissed earlier this year and Taylor was released after court-appointed doctors testified that he was incompetent to stand trial. Under federal and state law, mentally incompetent defendants cannot be prosecuted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Thank goodness mentally incompetent people can still purchase and own firearms, wouldn’t feel like freedom any other way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Not legally.

        The Gun Control Act (GCA), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), makes it unlawful for certain categories of persons to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition, to include any person:

        who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

        https://www.atf.gov/firearms/identify-prohibited-persons

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        911 months ago

        Not legally.

        The Gun Control Act (GCA), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), makes it unlawful for certain categories of persons to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition, to include any person:

        who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

        https://www.atf.gov/firearms/identify-prohibited-persons

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Yeah but that makes it harder for people to actually address the fact that high rates of firearm ownership is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for high rates of homicide, which has consistently been correlated with a lack of socioeconomic mobility among young adult men across societies and times. But that’s hard, so instead we just sarcastically post “FREEDOM” and “now is not the time to address guns” while, ironically, never actually doing the difficult but necessary work of discussing the underlying structural economic conditions and caste dynamics which lead to this problem. Because that’s hard.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            High rates of gun ownership is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for high rates of homicide. “Necessary” would imply that high homicide rate is flat out impossible without high gun ownership, which is clearly not true.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Mentally incompetent Americans. Mentally incompetent people in civilized countries usually don’t even come close to guns.

        EDIT: Looks like the ammosexuals don’t like my take. Yes, people lile you are left unarmed for good in civilized countries, if you like it or not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Wouldn’t his status as being mentally incompetent come up somewhere? I’m not from the USA and hate guns so I don’t know all the details about these background checks.

      • MedicsOfAnarchy
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        In some of our states, a “background check” is when the examiner looks up from his desk. If you’re blocking the background, he checks the “good to own a firearm” box.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Yeah except the part where it is federal law that all FFL dealers have to run an FBI NICSs check on all gun sales in every state because that is a federal law.