• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    I disagree, I think having an entire block burnt down made a lot of people decide they don’t want to see this happen again, in a way a regular protest wouldn’t have.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -48 months ago

      Really? You think people had their businesses burned down and their town destroyed and thought to themselves “boy I hope these people get what they wanted!” or do you think they thought “These people are human garbage and I hope they rot in prison”? Which one of these thought processes makes more sense to you?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Correct. English sufferage was only gained after a group of women took on learning jujitsu, wearing badass capes and paper body armor and went out burning government buildings and breaking all the windows in anti sufferagette buildings/homes and when police showed up they’d kick the shit out of them with jujitsu and then they’d make a speech the police couldn’t break up because their faces were meeting their asses for the first time and in a most uncomfortable way.

        Ed: because it’s interesting and I’m sure people won’t take my word.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrajitsu

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        The protests started because the police murdered a man in full view of a group of witnesses, a lot of people had a vested interest in making sure that didn’t happen again, in a way that non violent protest would not have achieved.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -38 months ago

          Quite the opposite. A non-violent protest would have achieved much more. The rioters and looters only obstructed the cause.