@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyzmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up11.01K
arrow-up1959imageWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year ago usually people consider mathematicians as scientists Yikes! … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoYou can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoIn twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoHistorians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoUsually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoYes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.
Yikes!
… Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.