@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 11 months agoWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyzmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up11K
arrow-up1958imageWe don't judge here. :)mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•11 months ago usually people consider mathematicians as scientists Yikes! … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•11 months agoYou can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agoIn twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoHistorians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agoUsually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoYes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.
Yikes!
… Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.