A voter-approved Oregon gun control law violates the state constitution, a judge ruled Tuesday, continuing to block it from taking effect and casting fresh doubt over the future of the embattled measure.

The law requires people to undergo a criminal background check and complete a gun safety training course in order to obtain a permit to buy a firearm. It also bans high-capacity magazines.

The plaintiffs in the federal case, which include the Oregon Firearms Federation, have appealed the ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The case could potentially go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    That’s what makes gun control such a difficult problem. People seem to forget that it is a right and those have extra weight behind them. While I want better gun control, I also don’t want our rights to be easily thrown away. The fact that the idea of a constitutional amendment seems so far fetched right now should be strong enough evidence that the system, as it was designed, has failed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        In order to get a new Amendment off the ground, you need a 2/3rds vote in the House. 290 votes.

        … Or an Article V convention forced by states. I’d wager money it’s going to happen in the next 25 years.

          • bedrooms
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            On the other hand, it only takes 5 judges to reinterpret the constitution…

          • Ooops
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            They will obviously never try to define “woke”. At this point it was intentionally shaped into trigger word to tell their moronic voters that something is bad without having to bring any actual arguments. An actual definition would hurt this prupose.