A voter-approved Oregon gun control law violates the state constitution, a judge ruled Tuesday, continuing to block it from taking effect and casting fresh doubt over the future of the embattled measure.
The law requires people to undergo a criminal background check and complete a gun safety training course in order to obtain a permit to buy a firearm. It also bans high-capacity magazines.
The plaintiffs in the federal case, which include the Oregon Firearms Federation, have appealed the ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The case could potentially go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Removed by mod
No, the firearms act is the thing that distinguished. It is not itself the justification for distinguishing.
Right now all you’re saying is “because that’s the law”. I want to know why you think that’s how the ought to be
Removed by mod
but I’m asking you. You can’t answer the question? Or choose not to? You think there’s no value in discussing these issues and trying to get people to agree? That’s how you get like-minded people elected, my dude.
Unless you’re saying nothing anyone can say will ever change your opinion on this issue. Which would be an end to any and all conversation
Removed by mod
Got it. You literally are incapable of having your own opinions because you think they “don’t matter”. We have nothing more to talk about. Peace ✌️
Removed by mod
Then next time just say “no” instead of pretending like you have some winning argument for a question that’s not being asked.
So you agree that armor-piercing ammunition should not be legal, correct? It shoots from a gun, but it explodes. So it is a destructive device.
Removed by mod
I asked if you agreed, not what the ATF did.
Removed by mod
Weird, then, that you’re fine giving it when you haven’t been asked for it.
Removed by mod
That in itself sounds like an opinion. Maybe you don’t know what an opinion is?