• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 months ago

    A company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.

    I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.

        This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.

        • Herbal Gamer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Microsoft didn’t make the other browsers pay for the privilege of being a browser though.