• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The statement they made, which I quoted, IS NOT BASED ON DECADES OF RESEARCH! It is based on their assumptions and the headline in this article.

    The study we are talking about makes it very clear in its first paragraph that there has been little-to-no prior research on the effects of processed foods and depression.

    Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

    It is literally the justification for this specific study having been done at all.

    This study only involved middle-aged white women (95% of participants) who didn’t suffer from depression at the start of the study. It measured incident depression over the course of 15 years and correlated that with various processed food categories.

    That person making the statement that processed foods increase the chance of depression in the general public is doing exactly what I was trying to get people to not do, which is turn this headline into false assumptions and unhelpful advice about general depression.

    I hate these reddit moments.

    • XbSuper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Jesus Christ dude. Read what they said, they are a medical professional, they are not making claims based on an article, but rather years of research.

      This has nothing to do with reddit, you’re just a moron.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They said this:

        The point is that that ultra-processed or unhealthy foods increase the risk for depression in the general public.

        The study we are talking about literally says this:

        Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

        We are talking about a study that in its opening paragraph, with sources, contradicts what they, as a random internet stranger claiming to be a medical professional, are claiming as the truth.

        I, for one, am going to side with the study over the person making claims with no evidence. Even a study that I think will cause people like you and the other person to act in foolish, unscientific, and very harmful ways.

        Anyway, you should go back to reddit with that attitude. Or downvote and move on. You added nothing of value here and were a jerk for absolutely no reason.