• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I understand that nothing I say will change your mind, which is why I didn’t provide an argument. But I don’t think it’s the government’s job, place, or right to tell people what they can and can’t put in their own bodies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I don’t think it’s the government’s job, place, or right to tell people what they can and can’t put in their own bodies.

          Nope. That’s the job of people who’ve worked their entire lives studying how to prolong our lifespan and improve our health; and those people advise the people we trust the most to guide our work, safety and consumer products regulations.

          “Mom and dad have too many rules” was kinda lame when it was about wearing a toque. You need to understand it better by now.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Alcohol is bad for you too. Are you going to ban that? Marijuana cigarettes also contain tar. Ban those too? Excessive screen time is unhealthy. Go after that next?

            The government has no place as the arbiter of what unhealthy habits are legal. The government works under a philosophy of incrementalism. If you task them with making unhealthy behaviors illegal, then you’re embarking on a road to outright fascism.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Alcohol is bad for you too. Are you going to ban that?

              I wish they did. My father died of alcoholism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      What benefit is there to allowing the sale of cigarettes when there are much safer nicotine delivery methods out there? If you want to roll your own you could still do that if this were to pass