Russian security forces raided gay clubs and bars across Moscow Friday night, less than 48 hours after the country’s top court banned what it called the “global LGBTQ+ movement” as an extremist organization.

Police searched venues across the Russian capital, including a nightclub, a male sauna, and a bar that hosted LGBTQ+ parties, under the pretext of a drug raid, local media reported.

Eyewitnesses told journalists that clubgoers’ documents were checked and photographed by the security services. They also said that managers had been able to warn patrons before police arrived.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      Florida here checking in.

      Our government is hard at work on this.

      Check out this pending bill up for vote during the next session: https://m.flsenate.gov/session/bill/2024/599/billtext/filed/pdf https://m.flsenate.gov/session/bill/2024/599/billtext/filed/pdf

      Essentially it makes it illegal to be transgender and have a job in government or government adjacent.

      Here is an excert: It is the policy of the state that a person’s sex is an immutable biological trait and that it is false to ascribe to a person a pronoun that does not correspond to such person’s sex. This section does not apply to individuals born with a genetically or biochemically verifiable disorder of sex development, including, but not limited to, XX disorder of sex development; XY disorder of sex development; sex chromosome disorder of sex development; XX or XY sex reversal; and ovotesticular disorder.

      An employee or a contractor may not be required, as a condition of employment, to refer to another person using that person’s preferred personal title or pronouns if such personal title or pronouns do not correspond to that person’s sex.
      An employee or a contractor may not provide to an employer his or her preferred personal title or pronouns if such preferred personal title or pronouns do not correspond to his or her sex.
      An employee or a contractor may not be asked by an employer to provide his or her preferred personal title or pronouns or be penalized or subjected to adverse personnel action for not providing his or her preferred personal title or pronouns.

      It continues on about not being able to fire people for thinking being gay is a sin and so on, but I don’t want this to be a novel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Well, if gay people weren’t sabotaging electric substations, mass murdering innocent people and attempting to overthrow our government…, oh, wait!

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Don’t forget that big gay plot to kidnap a governor, and the other big gay plot to seize control of the capitol, the Supreme Court, and the Department of State and installed Donald Trump as an unelected dictator. Yes, they planned on having a lot of proud boys go hard into Foggy Bottom.

          E: I forgot that other big gay plot to send mail bombs to all the Democratic leadership, ex-presidents, and governors that they could.

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            When do we get around to turning the frogs gay? That’s my favourite part.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well I for one am so glad the government of Florida is tackling the REAL problems. Pronouns are scary and difficult to understand, and I never had to deal with calling my friend Dick by anything other than his given name.

        /s because of poes law.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That bill doesn’t make it illegal for transgender people to have a job in government or government adjacent. It merely prohibits them from requiring (with the force of law) other people to acknowledge their sexual identity.

        No doubt it makes it difficult for some transgender people – namely those who are unable to function if people don’t acknowledge them – to hold some jobs, though, but it doesn’t forbid it as you imply.

        This is essentially a pro freedom of speech legislation. To compare this with the Russians raiding gay bars and making “gay propaganda” illegal is preposterous.

        If I read the bill wrong, please correct me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 year ago

          This is essentially a pro freedom of speech legislation.

          It’s not though. It doesn’t just protect employers to call anyone whatever pronoun they want, it mandates that the preferred pronoun for trans people (and others) are not used.

          It doesn’t just protect bigotry, it requires it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My reading of the bill is that it specifically forbids any mandates towards pronoun use. This may enable bigotry, but does not require it.

            But perhaps you can point to the sentence that requires bigotry since I missed it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              “An employee or a contractor may not provide to an employer his or her preferred personal title or pronouns if such preferred personal title or pronouns do not correspond to his or her sex.”

              You’re right that it doesn’t require bigotry, but this section says that if a transgender person is misgendered, they cannot even request to be referred to by their preferred pronouns. I understand not being forced to refer to any person by any specific name or pronoun, but not being able to share your preferences is the opposite of freedom of speech.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                Yes, seems like you were right and I was wrong. Thank you for correcting me.

                That’s indeed a rather shitty clause which goes beyond protecting free speech.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Translation: I don’t like what he says but I have no actual arguments so I’ll just ad hominem. That’ll show him.

            Thank you for, in your own peculiar way, confirming my conclusions though.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or, I have lots of actual arguments but recognize that I’m not your dad or your professor, and that I actually just think you’re stupid and not worth the time it would take to explain it to you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                I recognize this form of argumentation from middle school. As you are presumably an adult instead of a child, perhaps you should try to improve your argumentation skills quite a lot before continuing these “actual arguments” you claim to have.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Their Stochastic terrorism has too low of a rate. Either move onto more practical efforts, or make the whole world worse to increase the Stochastic terrorism rates.

      Well shit, they’re just going to do both.

    • cannache
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 year ago

      Hahaha, the word conservative dies at war doesn’t it?