I originally posted this on the other site back when I took the picture, and it resulted in a lot of confused comments, especially from Americans, eventually getting removed by overzealous mods. Either way, I promise you that this date does not exist, and has never existed.

  • eric
    link
    fedilink
    -201 year ago

    When was the last time you spoke a date in ISO format? Do you say “2023 February 29th?” If not, you intrinsically know ISO is not always the best format for the situation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Neither, it’s become about some guy who needs to be right. Even if clearly and objectively wrong.

      • eric
        link
        fedilink
        -181 year ago

        It’s about the correct standard, which if exists, should be the same whether spoken or written. I’m saying that no such standard exists, and there are different correct ways depending on the situation/region.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Written has ambiguity, spoken doesn’t. One has to be standardized and the other doesn’t.

          The topic is about written, not spoken since we all completely comprehend this.

          • eric
            link
            fedilink
            -10
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I disagree with that assumption.

            The comment I was originally replying to was talking about the two most debated formats while ignoring ISO for “non-technical” people. Those two formats are that way because of the way people most commonly speak it in the region where they originated. I agree that the best written format is ISO, but it’s not commonly used outside of technical circles because it requires that you say it in a different order than you read it, which proves difficult for a lot of people.