The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 months ago

    Whether I’m pirating or buying a TV show, the actors were already compensated for their time

    And where do you think that money comes from…?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      It just magically appears /s Its disingenuous to try and justify piracy on the basis that the performers have already been paid. I don’t agree with studios either of course, customers are being scammed

    • Venia Silente
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      From the investors who are paying the cheques of course. They are corporations, they can afford to spend some coins on [checks notes] living wages.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        That’s exactly it. Investors. They are not donations. They expect a return on their investments.

        • Venia Silente
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          And such “return” comes after the work, not before. So there’s no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people. Now that would be air-quotes “stealing”!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            And such “return” comes after the work

            And once again, where do you suppose it comes from?

            So there’s no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people.

            How does one “condition wages”?

            Is your argument simply that theft is a-ok 👌 when the person you’re stealing from is wealthy?