These early adopters found out what happened when a cutting-edge marvel became an obsolete gadget… inside their bodies.

    • massive_bereavement
      link
      fedilink
      1221 year ago

      Pretty much a good argument for forcing companies to open source any tech like this once it loses support.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        631 year ago

        This is the piece of legislation I truly wish to see. It either forces longer support periods or opening up the code. So win win.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          241 year ago

          Those details need to be held by a 3rd party though, because if the company goes under, then the code and any critical information may become lost. Executives, employees, and other people might be fired or jump ship prior to any trigger points, so there could be no one that can be held accountable.

          The FDA should hold everything necessary in escrow in perpetuity.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            611 months ago

            They need to be forced to supply them to each and every customer along with the product itself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      Sounds like FDA approval requires holding all details of the technology, including all source code, in escrow.

      If the company ever stops supporting the product, for any reason at all, all of the details become public property.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1311 months ago

        Why wait for the company to go under? FDA approval should mandate that the full spec and source code be open source and open to review by anyone, but especially the people in which those things are implanted and all of their medical practitioners. Medicine (and any publicly supported science in general) should never be closed off from public scrutiny.