• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What an angry person. I wrote specifically that I hadn’t read the article. Not every utterance should be taken so seriously.

        You could’ve corrected me on my out of date information which was absolutely true for a while. I would’ve been receptive to learning.

        In any case, there was zero chance here of any damage done, yet you behave as though I’m spreading harmful medical information or something. Bye.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not an angry person at all. I just think that you shouldn’t opine on articles you had no intention to read, and then make up information so you can argue non-points with people. And “out of date?” That’s a pretty broad defense isn’t it? Sure…… At a certain point there were no trillion dollar companies- until there was one. So it looks like you have the perfect defense there bud.

          I won’t apologise becasue It’s my belief that people need to be called out over this bullshit.

          We’re far too lax and forgiving of people who purposefully dilute information because they’re too lazy to bother to educate themselves- and then start lengthy arguments in defense of said bullshit.

          I’d like to think you’ll remember er this the next time you think to invent “facts” so you can join in a discussion.

          Don’t argue. Just do better.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah you kind blew the whole “I’m not angry” charade with the second half of this message.

            Edit: after browsing your comment history a moment, it’s quite clear I’m not nearly the first to feel the anger