• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Yeah yeah not protected, but same could be said for requiring blond hair or blue eyes. Still discrimination

      I am not a lawyer

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          How is that different from any other accident of birth that can’t be changed? People really do discriminate based on when you were born:

          Not hard to extrapolate a case from this. Imagine a landlord refusing to rent because you’re a “scorpio” or an employer turning you down because they’re looking for a “dog” person.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              69 months ago

              Agreed. A lot of people in this thread are confusing what they believe should be illegal discrimination with what is actually illegal discrimination. Or they believe discrimination laws are more broadly encompassing than they are. There are a lot of kinds of discrimination that most of us agree is bad and shouldn’t be allowed… but unfortunately is not illegal.

              • AFK BRB Chocolate
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 months ago

                Exactly. And though there are protected classes at the federal level, there are also some at the state level and they vary. I’m in California, and we have more than most. If you’re a business owner or manager, you have to know what they are where you are or it can be really bad.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Yeah more of a case for public shaming or filing a complaint or even just an honest Glass Door review

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        Because requiring blond hair and blue eyes would, by definition, exclude people based on race.