• Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      Only some of them. To be fair, most are ephebophiliacs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Why would you ask ChatGPT anything? LLMs are not search engines, they literally make shit up. You might as well ask a GOP politician to explain ethics to you.

          When filing a response, Mata’s lawyers cited at least six other cases to show precedent, including Varghese v. China Southern Airlines and Shaboon v. Egypt Air—but the court found that the cases didn’t exist and had “bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations,” leading a federal judge to consider sanctions.

          A member of Mata’s law team then revealed he had used ChatGPT to conduct legal research for the court filing that referenced the cases and that the artificial intelligence tool assured him the cases were real.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            LLM fanboys would boil the oceans for a form response to their dentist office’s Merry Christmas text. Just slop another nuclear reactor’s worth of parameters on top because I wanted “Doctor” abbreviated as “Dr.” please.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -311 months ago

            It’s a definition, not looking up a legal case. I use the tool for what it’s good at: basic info, like definitions or API documentation, or translating text, or rewording emails to convey a specific tone.

            Your argument is like saying you can’t paint an oil painting with a ballpoint pen. No fucking shit.