EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

    • @BigBlackBuck
      link
      English
      576 months ago

      This is like the second or third post I have seen in the past week talking about “belief” in science. Science isn’t about belief, it’s about understanding. Maybe this post should be, “What facts are you questioning because you don’t understand the underlying data?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          What it is, is an extremely powerful tool for reducing uncertainty about the world. Not eliminate, reduce. What it is not is a tool for “proving” “facts”. Claiming a “proven fact” is belief, not empirical science. An extremely consistent and useful theory, of course! But not a proven fact.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              06 months ago

              Do you not know what a metaphysic is? A metaphysic is something that affects the world without actually existing. Information is metaphysics. Law is metaphysics. Gender is definitely metaphysics. Science is too.

              Y’all downvoting me because you’re taking offense to a word you can’t bother looking up the definition of. Peak stupidity and tribalism right here. You make up your identity(which is also a metaphysic) based on imagery and social appeal and sling shit just like chimps.

              • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                Could it be that people are downvoting you because you’re using words wrong while acting like you are educated on the matter? 😉

                  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    I’m aware of what metaphysics is. I’m also aware that it’s based in philosophy, not science, as you stated.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        -156 months ago

        That might have been a better title but it would get less responses and also the title never mentions “belief in science” as you put it, the explicit title is something Scientific that you DON’T believe in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          A lot of people not wanting to disassociate the term believe from relgion here. I believe the sun will rise tomorrow. I also believe the sun doesn’t rise. Neither have to do with a religious belief system for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Science should be questioned by people who understand the science, not by random people who don’t understand the research. Which a lot of people who know nothing about the science or the maths/data or whatever try to question it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          86 months ago

          Right, all the people talking shit about dark matter in this thread surely all have 4 PhDs up their ass

          No investigation, no right to speak

        • YeetPics
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          This is a really stupid take, how do you think new scientists are made if not reaching for enlightenment to answer their own questions?

          Science is about being wrong and learning.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yes, and people that challenge the science who then become scientists actually research/experiment thenselves. They don’t go and claim science is false until they have actual reason/evidence to believe so. One can question science all they want when they do their own science on the matter and it isn’t handily disproved beyond reasonable doubt by existing evidence.

            Most science deniers do not do that. Making anti-science claims without obtaining solid, consistent evidence is not science.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          People are free to express what they think about science. There’s no law saying otherwise. Why are you guys so upset?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            “There’s no law against it” is a laughably stupid reason to do something. They’re free to do it but everyone else is free to acknowledge that their uneducated/misinformed skepticism is harmful to society and that their opinions are meaningless to those who aren’t dumb. Leave the contemporary science denial to those who actually somewhat know what they’re talking about.

            • [email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              36 months ago

              The person you’re replying to believes climate change to be a lie, so I think you’re probably wasting your time.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -36 months ago

              This is a question on AskLemmy. It won’t change anything in the world. Why do you care? You guys should touch grass

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -16 months ago

                  Let’s touch grass together to measure how much photosynthesis grass can do? Please, it will be fun. But I’m open to another scientific experiment if you have anything in mind

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -106 months ago

      The top comment is a proper debate about leading scientific theories, and the most downvoted comment is somebody who thinks the moon landing is faked, both of which have healthy and honest debate with goodwill from both sides.

      This entire post is about Skepticism, which is an integral part of Science. To shut down the conversation would be Anti-Science.