US commits to landing an international astronaut on the Moon
arstechnica.com
This ticket to the Moon will probably go to a European or Japanese astronaut.

US commits to landing an international astronaut on the Moon - This decade::This ticket to the Moon will probably go to a European or Japanese astronaut.

  • @[email protected]English
    1•1 year ago

    I’m referencing modern insulation, not spray foam. Additionally, NASA and it’s prior organization was founded to develop aerospace technologies like spray foam. It literally counts as well.

    The CO2 saved through the technologies required at scale will be worth a lot more CO2.

    I’m glad you mentioned the military technologies because it is still relevant as we pivot to counter China in space. NASA is a significant part of that not only in industrial scale but also technologies critical to intelligence.

      • @[email protected]English
        1•1 year ago

        Technology absolutely has reduced CO2 emissions on a per capita basis when applied. That is a categorically and demonstratively false statement in several different ways. Electric vehicles were only made viable using 1970s NASA battery technology developments. They are significantly more carbon efficient than internal combination engines over their lifetime accounting for production and raw materials.

        https://www.arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/Miller_RANGE_Kickoff_2014.pdf

        That’s not to mention the solar technologies developed by NASA to power the things.

        The level of ignorance required to come to your conclusions is only surpassed by the required level of arrogance to not bother looking it up.

          • @[email protected]English
            0•1 year ago

            Why is it that in your world NASA and the military are in no way linked? I’ve worked in defense procurement. Literally every time you mention defense procurement the core technologies were developed through NASA contracts and proof of concepts.

            The reason I’m not sending you proof is because you aren’t worth the time. These things are a matter of public record. You are so far off base that there is literally nothing I can send you that will pull your head out of the sand.

              • @[email protected]English
                0•1 year ago

                I literally don’t believe that you ever were involved in any level of requirements analysis or weapons programs.