Stamets to People [email protected] • 1 year agoThe dreamlemmy.worldmessage-square237fedilinkarrow-up11.96K
arrow-up11.92KimageThe dreamlemmy.worldStamets to People [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square237fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoGlorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoYesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
minus-squareladlinkfedilink2•1 year agoWell, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoSo why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
Machine learning?
Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.
I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
Is that not a type of AI already?
Well, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,