• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        But Steam is pretty dominant. Steam is also pretty well behaved and privately owned. If they ever went public, I could see all sorts of hijinx Steam could pull with their PC gaming dominance, between exclusive release deals, leveraging publishers to use Steam exclusive tools, etc.

        That’s all hypothetical though at this point, but I still like to buy stuff on GoG and Humble Bundle at least sometimes, even though with my Steam Deck, and just Steam’s Linux support, Steam is by far the best and easiest way to buy games.

        I think as long as Gabe and actual Steam employees continue to run things, we are okay. It’s when the venture capitalists and such get in, that they start to “maximise profit”, and everything gets enshittified, the service tanks, becomes a shell of it’s former self, and yet the vultures all take off with mad stacks. Steam has earned my trust, and they seem to continue to deserve it.

    • Primarily0617
      link
      fedilink
      -4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      steam is a monopoly

      they’re engaging in price fixing, which is pretty much by definition monopolistic activity, by denying publishers the ability to price games lower on other distribution platforms

      if ea, the otherwise second largest distributor on the platform, can’t compete without crawling its way back to steam, then it’s pretty clearly a monopoly

        • Primarily0617
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          “exposes your wild hyperbole” lmao

          your argument is that all these organisations are successively: setting up shop, attempting to compete with steam, and then failing, should be all the proof you need that steam has a monopoly on the PC market

          comcast doesn’t have less of a monopoly on internet just because google fiber exists in one city somewhere