sunnie to Programmer [email protected] • 9 months agono.. just nolemmy.camessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1560
arrow-up1541imageno.. just nolemmy.casunnie to Programmer [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink15•9 months agoI’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
minus-squarePrimarily0617linkfedilink32•9 months agosql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•9 months agoProbably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
I’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
sql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
deleted by creator