@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 11 months agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.commessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1294
arrow-up1147external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.com@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square171fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•11 months agoPersonally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•11 months agoIt costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agoYou just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoDude. Fucking context: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights
Personally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
It costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
You just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
Dude. Fucking context: