@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 1 year agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.commessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1294
arrow-up1147external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.com@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square171fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoPersonally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)linkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoIt costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoYou just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoDude. Fucking context: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights
Personally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
It costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
You just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
Dude. Fucking context: